Technical & SEO Audit

Technical and search audits for eCommerce, web applications and automation systems

Agile Codex reviews Magento and other eCommerce implementations, websites, PWAs, custom applications, integrations, data workflows, and controlled AI automation. We identify reliability, performance, maintainability, security-exposure, and search-visibility risks, then turn the findings into a prioritized remediation plan.

  • eCommerce and Magento
  • Web and PWA applications
  • Integrations and data
  • AI workflow controls

Choose the audit scope around the system and risk

An audit should answer a defined business question: why a system is slow or unreliable, what blocks an upgrade, where an integration can fail, or why important pages are difficult to discover. We agree the boundaries and access required before beginning.

Magento and eCommerce audit

Review storefront behavior, checkout, extensions, indexing, cron, caching, search, deployment, administration workflows, and platform-specific upgrade risks.

Website, PWA and application audit

Assess frontend behavior, responsive layouts, application architecture, dependencies, authentication boundaries, API usage, error handling, and maintainability.

Integration and data audit

Map data ownership, synchronization, validation, retries, schedules, logs, exception handling, reconciliation, and recovery across connected systems.

AI automation review

Review approved knowledge sources, permissions, tool access, human approval points, privacy boundaries, audit logs, backups, and failure-handling procedures.

Infrastructure and performance

Inspect relevant runtime compatibility, web and search services, databases, queues, caching, scheduled jobs, monitoring, backup arrangements, and frontend performance.

SEO, AEO and local MEO audit

Review crawlability, structured content, internal linking, answer-engine readiness, and local map visibility where those channels fit the business.

View search audit service →

What we examine in a technical audit

The final checklist is system-specific. These are common review areas rather than a claim that every engagement requires every test.

Reliability and operations

  • Recurring application and infrastructure errors
  • Failed scheduled jobs, queues, indexing, or synchronization
  • Checkout, payment, order, and customer-flow failures
  • Monitoring, backup, recovery, and ownership gaps

Architecture and maintainability

  • Custom code, extensions, dependencies, and upgrade constraints
  • API contracts, data validation, retries, and failure visibility
  • Deployment process, environment differences, and configuration drift
  • Documentation and operational handover requirements

Performance and exposure

  • Cache behavior, queries, services, assets, images, and third-party scripts
  • Authentication, authorization, secrets, permissions, and public paths
  • Unsupported software and vulnerable dependency indicators
  • Search crawl, metadata, canonical, sitemap, and rendering problems

Related specialist services

Use a focused service when the primary requirement is already clear, or combine it with a broader audit when several systems and teams are involved.

Audit deliverables

The report is designed to support decisions and implementation, not simply produce a long automated checklist.

System and risk summary

A concise explanation of the reviewed scope, important dependencies, observed symptoms, and material risks.

Evidence-based findings

Issues documented with affected areas, supporting evidence, severity, and relevant limitations.

Prioritized roadmap

Immediate containment, practical short-term fixes, and longer-term architecture or maintenance recommendations.

Implementation options

Developer-ready tasks and, when requested, a separate scoped proposal for remediation or ongoing support.

Scope boundaries

A technical audit is not automatically a penetration test, legal compliance certification, financial audit, or guarantee that every defect or security vulnerability will be found. Where specialist testing or formal certification is required, we identify that dependency and agree it separately.

How the audit works

Access is kept proportional to the agreed scope, and production-changing tests are not performed without explicit approval.

1

Define scope

Identify systems, symptoms, business impact, access, exclusions, and the decisions the audit must support.

2

Collect evidence

Review approved configuration, code, logs, workflows, metrics, and representative user journeys.

3

Analyze and prioritize

Connect symptoms to likely causes, validate material findings, and prioritize by risk and effort.

4

Review next steps

Walk through findings, answer questions, and define remediation, monitoring, or specialist follow-up.

Need a clearer view of your technical and search risks?

Share the system, current symptoms, recent changes, business impact, available access, and target date. We will recommend a focused audit scope rather than a generic checklist.